Rise of the Planet of the Apes vs. Dawn of the Planet of the Apes

These were both excellent movies, but one movie is always better than the other, in this review I will show which one is better than the other. These were both directed by different people, I do not know why though. There were different humans in each movie that liked the apes, the first movie it was James Franco and the second one it was Jason Clarke. James Franco was more likeable because he took care of Caesar (the main ape) and was really kind. Jason Clarke was nice but he had a gun and he shot some people so he is not as good as James Franco, so that is one point for Rise of the Planet of the Apes. The backgrounds of each movie are important too, the first one it is in a nice San Fransisco, the second one is in a diseased San Fransisco. So that is another point for Rise of the Planet of the Apes because they have a nicer background not an ugly destroyed one. What also determines a good movie is how much action is in each movie. The first movie did not have much at all, most of the movie took place in an ape prison the only real action was at the end when the apes attack San Fransisco. The second movie had a ton of action, the humans and apes fought each other with machine guns and tanks it was way cooler than the first. So that is one point for Dawn of the Planet of the Apes. There a plenty of other factors that make a good movie but I will only show three, Rise of the Planet of the Apes was better than the second movie, however they are both outstanding movies.